Unrighteous Judgment
Why America will Fall

This page originally was dedicated to 9-11 and the anthrax attacks and how it led to our war in Afghanistan. However, I am now changing this page. Some of the questions I posed have some satisfactory answers, especially concerning the alleged terrorists. However, all questions have not been satisfactory answered on the matter, and especially concerning the WTC buildings destruction. I, and many others, remain skeptical that these supposed terrorists did what the US government claims they did. I am not one to point out who did what, because I have no idea, but I do have suspicions, but my website isn't about suspicions, and because of my stance I discuss here:  Babylon's Authority is Ordained to Come , I will not uncover the wrong doings for Babylon's arrival.

The point of the original page was to show there is just cause to doubt the justification of attacking Afghanistan. 

You see, the Bible tells us we must judge righteously.

John 7:24  Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.

Mt:7:2: For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

Scripture, as well as American law asks us to make good judgments, and not make judgments when reasonable doubt exists. War is an act of judgment.

Rom 13:
1: Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
2: Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
3: For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
4: For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.

Therefore bringing the sword (justice), without due process is wrong and unjust. I am convinced our war with Afghanistan was a manifestation of the injustice of the US government. And lately, the same is being said with drone attacks that the government said it would use on it's own citizens.

What made it worse is how quickly the government blamed Muslims for the anthrax attacks.


Guardian newspaper reported Sunday that American investigators probing anthrax outbreaks in Florida and New York believe they have all the hallmarks of a terrorist attack -- and have named Iraq as the prime suspect as the source of the deadly spores. 

The London paper quoting CIA sources as saying that "Iraq has the technology and supplies of anthrax suitable for terrorist use."

One CIA source told the paper: "They aren't making this stuff in caves in Afghanistan. This is prima facie evidence of the involvement of a state intelligence agency. Maybe Iran has the capability. But it doesn't look likely politically. That leaves Iraq."
[NewsMax 10-15-01]


USA Today - Anthrax came from US lab. 

The Anthrax letters came from inside the United States.

The letters contained a specific type of weaponized Anthrax made by a United States military lab which had been claiming for a lot of years that it wasn't doing that sort of thing any more...

The pattern of the mailings of the Anthrax letters was also suspicious. Congress got their Anthrax letters just in time for the vote on the disingenuously named
USA Patriot Act (aka the anti-terror bill) which the terrorized Senators voted into law without bothering to read. The bill was signed on Oct. 26, 2001, and  it opened the door for a wide array of civil rights and liberties violations. How convenient for the bill's sponsors that there was a terror attack on the Congress just when Congress was about to vote on the anti-terror bill. Eerie timing, isn't it? 

So now, knowing that the Anthrax letters came from an American source, take another look at the actual letters.

Click letters for full sized image
There are several indications of deliberate deception in these items.

A terrorist group who hates every American would not advertise the fact that the letters contained a biological weapon, they would have enclosed an innocuous letter to ensure maximum spread of the agent. Look at the letters, they are virtually shouting "seal off the area and see a doctor now!"

...Dates written by Middle Easterners begin with the day first, then the month, then the year - the date should have read 11-9-01. The above letters follow the American convention for dates.

One of the letters is a photocopy of another. Most places which have copiers have typewriters or word processors, appliances whose operation is no mystery to the sort of people who go in and out of government laboratories.

In short, the entire look of the letters is a contrived fake, creating what they thought a letter from Arabs would look like, so that the phrases "Death to Israel", and "Allah is Great" (a real Muslim says either "Allah Achbar" or "God is Great") would point the finger of blame for the Anthrax at Arabs.

Except that we know for a fact that the Anthrax didn't come from the Middle East. It isn't Saddam's or Osama's, it's the very best high quality mil-spec Anthrax home grown at Fort Detrick, Dugway, and USAMRIID.

It's our Anthrax.

And that means that all the slanted writing, the extra crossings on the "T"s, the references to Allah and Israel are a carefully crafted hoax, designed to trick Americans into thinking that Arab Muslims were to blame for the Anthrax letters.


You can read who was actually implicated of these attacks on Wikipedia:


On April 11, 2007, Ivins was put under periodic surveillance and an FBI document stated that "Bruce Edwards Ivins is an extremely sensitive suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks." On July 27, 2008, Ivins took an intentional overdose of acetaminophen and died two days later in a hospital.

On August 6, 2008, despite having no direct evidence of his involvement, federal prosecutors declared Ivins to be the sole culprit of the crime. Two days later, Senator Charles Grassley and Rep. Rush Holt called for hearings into the DOJ and FBI's handling of the investigation. On February 19, 2010, the FBI formally closed its investigation.


So 9-11 and the anthrax attacks were used to make war on Afghanistan, and unjustly and unrighteous. It is possible that Afghanistan was allowing the terrorists responsible for 9-11 to have training camps, but not enough evidence has been provided for such war.

Other things have been working against the fall of America. Outlawing prayer in school. Legalizing murder of babies. And recently the illegal passing of ObamaCare.

•Obamacare never had “the consent of the governed”. It was passed via a 60-vote majority in the Senate that the electorate never intended the Democrats to have.  In the 2008 elections, the voters wanted to deliver the maximum possible jolt to the Republicans, in the hope of shaking up that party, and bringing forth new leaders, with better ideas than those of George W. Bush. However, the electorate was not counting on the Democrats being able to steal the Senate election in Minnesota. Horrified by what had happened, the voters corrected this at the earliest opportunity by electing Republican Scott Brown to fill Teddy Kennedy’s seat in Massachusetts.  Unfortunately, the Democrats were able to exploit their narrow window of opportunity to pass Obamacare. The electorate has been mobilizing to get rid of it ever since. Their first step was the spontaneous generation of the Tea Party. The second was the 2010 elections, which wiped out huge numbers of Obamacare supporters in both the House and the Senate, and ended Nancy Pelosi’s reign as Speaker.

•The Obamacare bill was written in secret. It was brought to the floors of the House and the Senate without committee hearings. The people that voted to pass the bill had not read it. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid bought the last few votes they needed with taxpayer money via back-room deals with names like “The Louisiana Purchase”, and “The Cornhusker Kickback”. Ignoring the sharp rebuke from voters contained in the election of Scott Brown to the Senate, the Democrats obtained final passage of Obamacare via “reconciliation”, a process that was never intended for this kind of legislation.

•No matter what the Supreme Court says, Obamacare is unconstitutional. The Constitution was written specifically to limit the powers of the federal government. By ruling on Obamacare the way it did, the Supreme Court has said that the power of the federal government is effectively unlimited. Congress can now force citizens to do anything it wants, simply by taxing them for not doing what it wants. Americans did not fight the British Crown in 1776 merely to replace one tyrannical government possessing unlimited, arbitrary power over their lives with another.


The question here is whether the insurance mandate, which is at the heart of Obamacare, is in fact a tax. This is a crucial point. Until and unless martial law is declared, the Federal government must justify its laws under the powers granted it by the Constitution. There’s no way the government can justify compelling an individual citizen to purchase a particular product. Such a mandate would be illegal and unprecedented. This is not analogous to, for example, requiring insurance on a car, since your decision to acquire a car was voluntary. You chose to engage in an act of commerce, and thus subjected yourself to a regulated transaction or environment. On the other hand, the insurance mandate is a regulation on your very existence. You see the problem? If this stands, then by the same logic the government can likewise regulate your diet. After all, if you’re not eating right, you’re exceeding your health care footprint. Next thing you know, the government will require you to purchase (and consume) a box of shredded wheat every week.

So the government can’t, under the law, make you buy a thing. But, as we know all too well, the government has the power to tax. Therefore, the legal defense of Obamacare must necessarily be that the mandate is merely another tax. It must be a new and pretty weird tax, in that it’s paid to a third party. But it’s a tax. That’s the argument the Justice Department attempted to make.

So saying all this, this is why, at least some of the reasons, why I believe judgment is coming on America, and the church; and why I believe God has declared for us to prepare for the yoke (see the following link for more).

 Babylon's Authority is Ordained to Come

Being rash and picking up the sword so quickly is wrong.

Pr 15:18
A wrathful man stirreth up strife: but he that is 
slow to anger appeaseth strife.

Pr 16:32
He that is slow to anger is better than the 
mighty; and he that ruleth his spirit than he that 
taketh a city.

I discuss this problem here:

 Should we pick up the Sword?

I also think the rashness of our government is the manifested fruit of it's true nature.

Prov 29: NKJV 
2 When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan.

© 2000 - 2018 powered by
Doteasy Web Hosting